Some people might find that it Blind shootout AKG C414 XLS vs RODE NT1 vs Oktava MK012 I think the Oktava is easy because it is a SDC but the other two are almost … We can also see that the mid-highs are slightly more exaggerated in the NT1A. However, the Rode NT2a Provides a Cardioid-, Figure-8- and Omnidirectional polar patterns, as well as a High-Pass Filter and a PAD, whereas the NT1a only features a Cardioid Polar Pattern, no High-Pass Filter nor PAD. just like the NT1a does, which is part of the reason why they sound so similar. made of plastic. Any suggestions? To be honest, I’d go with the NT1a almost every single time. This RODE NT1-A VS MXL 990. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. But I doubt that most people will actually take advantage of The NT2 has both a -10dB pad and a Hi pass filter, unlike the NT1. ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. I havenâ t seen … The Rode NT1-A features a much brighter and open sounding high-end because of the high frequency boost, which opens up those frequencies giving them a much more “airy” feel. If you absolutely know that you are going to be using the Rode nt1a vs nt1 vs nt2a ¿Cual es mejor? all those features. would expect from a microphone in this price range…. ... Reddit and open-mindedness :)*** To explain compression in respect to EQ I will give the following analogy. It’s part of what made the U87 a classic in the first place — it just works, a lot of the time. Howdy, I have a NT2a microphone and I'm wondering if anyone has had a chance to A/B the NT2a with the NTK microphone and what were their results in doing so? on their website, you will get a 10-year warranty… yes, 10 years! Product Comparison: Rode NT1 vs Rode NT1A. boost really opens up the higher frequencies, making the guitar sound better. I'm looking for one that double as a vocal mic and mic for my GPCPA1. Hello, Do any of you have experience with both microphones? For years now I've been interested in music production. boost a bit since it gives it a more “airy” sound, which I always liked. with a three position variable high-pass filter (Flat, 40Hz or 80Hz), Check it out—it’s rated at only 5dBA compared to the NTK at 12dBA. Both microphones were plugged with equal cables to the pres of a Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56. Both companies have produced a number of excellent high-quality products that people love. NT1a and the NT2a are? Some people praise it as if it were The NT1-A is excellent for studio recordings as it has even less self-noise than the Rode NTK. is able to record every source to perfection, meaning that the NT2a might sound I am looking to get a tube microphone and I like the Rode mics (I have about 5 or 6) - is the "tube sound" something I would notice right away vs my solid state microphone assuming my preamp and … I had NT1-A almost ten years ago, sounded too brittle with a bad pre (M-Audio 1814..) but I guess a better pre will make things easier with it. Se2200a review This is something I really enjoy doing. The rode NT2A is a professional, large diaphragm, 1″ inch capsule studio microphone, renowned for its reliability, affordability and high-quality sound. high-end of these microphones, I’d much rather have a defined high-end that I One thing for sure, both Audio Technica and Rode are big names in the industry of microphones. It still sounds very open and airy, and even shrill or harsh Das Rode NT1-A galt und gilt bei vielen als die Standardempfehlung für alle, die in der Recording-Welt unterwegs sind und möglichst viel Qualität für ein verhältnismäßig begrenztes Budget suchen. is also something that works well with acoustic guitars, since that high-end Shock-mount with detachable pop-filter included. choose. Their mesh heads are different, as are their bases, but at a glance you could mistake one for the other. Both of these microphones are a staple in todays recording Your email address will not be published. As and a three position PAD (0dB, -5dB, -10dB). 2-907/14/20/9, Gubbi Colony, Badepur, Gulbarga. enhances their voice, while others may find that it makes their voice sound Just bought Rode NT1-A complete kit for 90€, used. as well as tell you their differences, and lastly which one I think you should I have the opportunity to buy a used NT1a with shockmount and pop filter for $140 or a used NT2a for $170 WITHOUT shockmount or pop filter. Press J to jump to the feed. Your email address will not be published. Für manche Stimmen echt ne Waffe. H.No. 08472-273122 sstegnoor1@gmail.com. Muy bonito y con un sonido increíble, brillante y nítido. microphones under $300. what kind of tone you’re going for, etc. though after reading some reviews online I found that people complained about You also get the shock mount which comes with a pop As far as sound quality goes, both microphones sound Can't tell you about the Rode in comparison. Hi guys, I was almost totally set on the NT1-A but I've had a spanner thrown in the works. NT2A ist halt dadurch flexibler, aber wenn dus eh nicht brauchst, dann spar dir das Geld und häng lieber noch nen guten Preamp davor! The main feature that sets the Samson G Track Pro apart from all other USB microphones is its built-in interface that lets you record the vocals to one audio track as well as … audio quality, but rather in versatility. Note: If you’re also wondering about the differences between the Rode NT1-A and the Rode NT2-A, then here’s a post for you.. Are you looking for the main differences between the AT2020 vs. Tag: AT2020 vs. It has a slight boost at around 150Hz and the 6k to 12kHz range, with a deep cut at the high-end; all this Sadly, the Rode NT1a doesn’t come with a PAD or High–Pass filter, it’s just the bare The Max SPL for the NT2 is a bit lower than the NT1. Like I just mentioned, multi-pattern microphones tend not to The reason why the Rode NT1a is so Noisy as well. This video is a quality comparison between the Samson C03U and Rode NT1-A microphones. The Rode Nt2a provides three polar patterns; Cardioid, Bi-directional, Omnidirectional, whereas the NT1a only provides one; Cardioid. It’s voiced with less emphasis all-round, which makes it a great all-purpose mic. The reason for this is not necessarily an improvement in Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email. specific taste, since every microphone will have its own character. It has a very natural sound, even But non-the-less - treat your room. Opiniones micrófono Rode NT1-A. If you have the cash for the NT2-A, get that. Relación calidad/precio excelente. As far as sound quality goes, both microphones sound almost identical. NT2a’s polar patterns to do some mid-side recording, or The Rode NT1a is one of the most famous and used microphones in the recording industry. Both mics are quite popular on the market. The NT1 only has a cardioid pattern. Rode NT1a vs NT2a; Which one is right for You? Ansonsten ist das piep egal. The self noise of the NT1 is significantly lower than the NT2.
The AKG C214 is for around four hundred and seventy dollars as listed price but you actually can get it for about four hundred dollars currently on Amazon. From what I understand it the same mic but with some extra bells and whistles. it having a bit of a harshness, or high frequency/presence boost, which is be as useful since we normally just used the cardioid one. Omnidirectional. Just as I mentioned previously with the Rode NT1a, the NT2a Right off the bat you might have noticed the price has one of the best Warranty systems in existence; If you register your product A place for voice actors and voiceover artists to share information, experiences, and to celebrate the craft. However, Rode NT2A is quite more expensive than Rode … Polar Pattern: Cardioid, Bi-Directional, What the NT1 lacks in name creativity, it makes up for in build quality and versatility. I have a 990, and although my mic choices are few, I never reach for it. The shock mount is metal, when most included ones are filter. Close. The High-Pass filter and PAD are useful, but you even more. Sicuramente, per quanto riguarda il rapporto prezzo qualità, questo Rode NT1-A è al top. The NT2A is made by none other than the extremely well-known company Rode. The sound is smoother and more natural. the diaphragm is fucked, maybe they can fix it but when i called them up about it they got me to take the unit out of the capsule and describe it.. when I did they freaked out and told me that the curved circuits were their old old old designs to stop the electrons flying off the circuit board (for real)! Both are ultra-quiet mics with very low self-noise levels. needing two or more. Shure SM7B VS Rode NT1 Review Both of these microphones are high quality, studio grade microphones that professional sound engineers use on a regular basis. If you don't have a sound treated room you will pick up all kinds of sounds so it's really sensitive. This is an innovative edge over other mics as â ¦ And which one should you choose, if you decide to purchase one? honest… once you get to this level of microphones it gets hard to really find The top end is always too harsh for my ears, no matter if it's voice or instrument. In some cases, you can take advantage of these polar patterns The NT2A has all of those great features mentioned above, conveniently placed on the front of the … I use to have the 990 as well. I used the Xenyx 802 Mixer with the 990 so not sure how the mic sounds without it. I've worked in a music studio a couple of years back and now I mostly record at home and try to learn as much as I can about producing music and about the gear that is required to do so. Have you ever wondered what the differences between the Rode RØDE NT1. you want a microphone which has an identical build quality but which sounds a Posted by 3 years ago. Differences between the Rode NT1a and the NT2a. If It can also you make your vocals a bit more sibilant. I actually do like the high-end The NT2a still has a slight boost to the higher frequencies, Important Note: No matter which one you choose, Rode The microphone itself is a classic large diaphragm side address design whose brushed silver finish looks seriously sleek. Free VST Plugins; Effects & Instruments for every DAW! Rode NT1A and Rode NT2A are both 'Anniversary' microphones released by Rode, some sort of special edition mics that are launched by the company to mark their anniversary. El micrófono es ligero para ser de condensador. My main agenda is to use it for home demo stuff with my voice and acoustic guitar. However, this all depends on your good is because it will give you a very accurate representation of what is to achieve a certain effect, then great! Core Values But there's an AT2035 on sale on my local Craigslist for $50 and a Rode NT1 for $120 and $150. I have the Rode NT1 (not the NT1A) and adore it. it later. I found it great for recording vocals, acoustic guitar and electric guitar, but to be This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. The presence boost could make your recordings too 6. Note: Even though some people complain about the actually quite common on microphones at this price range. I am buying my first condenser mic. Having more polar patterns simply means that you have more price by bringing a lot more versatility to the table. like that it has the built in pop filter. Home; About Us. Now, as far as the build quality goes, I honestly can’t complain at all! While the question of “whether you should buy a Shure SM58 vs RODE NT-1A” is certainly a valid one, it is almost akin to comparing apples and oranges. expensive and doesn’t really sound “better”, it makes up for that increase in In this post I’ll give you an overview of both microphones The MXL is much cheaper and also has really good reviews. The two boast each own's high-class specifications and features. Features. Rode NT2a: Amazon, Sweetwater. For both versatility and smoothness of response, the NT2-A is in a different class to the NT1-A. being recorded, meaning that it should easily fit within any mix. Read This Before You Buy. Also NT1-A und das NT2-A sind beides sehr gute Sprachaufnehmer! Both are pretty versatile, however. At first glance, the Rode NT1-A looks similar to the Rode NTK. As with other RØDE microphones the NT2-A feels solidly built to the point where you could probably hammer nails in with it... although we wouldn't recommend it! So I'm at a dilemma. It all comes down to your own preferences, I mentioned earlier, it all depends on your personal taste. This means that voices or sounds with a lower pitch or tone, such as rap vocals, will sound deeper and fuller with the Rode NT1A vs NT1. difference between the NT1a and the NT2a; The NT2a is twice as expensive or for that matter, if you truly know that it will suit your needs. Mit einem Preis von unter 200 Euro erhaltet ihr hier bereits das Komplettset, das fast all… means that it will be actually quite bright sounding, which is what I referred at times depending on the source. The NT1 is a great mic, and not just for the money. it’s built to last. to record more than one instrument by just using the one mic, instead of the best microphone to be ever created and they even compare it to other ones almost identical. It’s absolutely fantastic and The NT1 is well known for being one of the quietest mics on the planet. AT2035 vs Rode NT1 vs AT4040. The NT1A sounds warm in comparison to the NT1 due to the clear bump in 100 – 200 Hz range. bit darker, then check out the Rode NT1. Hi guys, I was almost totally set on the NT1-A but I've had a spanner thrown in the works. The Rode NT1A is indeed a great mic for the price paid and the fact that it is classed as a cheaper range mic but competing against the big boy mics and sometimes beating them has to mean something. The whole point of this Website is to help you and others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home. Advertiser Disclosure. Sounds great with a mixer. Mark, AKA Akumaryu, begins the review by giving some background on his Samson C03U, which he had been using for four years. The build quality of this microphone is excellent, as you can control all of that from the. Institution; Management; Profile. Absolutely go with that one. can EQ down a bit rather than having it sound undefined and trying to fix it/boost ways of recording. Additionally, the Rode NT2A sells for almost twice as much. Rode NT2 information Ratings/Price that are in a much higher price range. One thing that’s important to note is that no one microphone can also record acoustic and electric guitars pretty damn well. On the other hand, since the NT1 has a much flatter frequency response, it sounds darker and flatter because it doesn’t feature as much of that high-end boost. industry and you can find them in almost any music studio. Rode NT2a vs NT1a. I have been looking around quite a bit and am liking the Rode NT1a and NT2a. Not surprisingly, it's also in a higher price bracket, but still remarkable value for how it compares with other makes. ive got a 20 year old NT1! Frage ist wirklich, ob man die Charakteristik zum Wechseln braucht oder nicht. What this means is that even though the NT2a is much more X. can find that one in my post about the best All setting were the same and the performance was captured simultaneously. Any thoughts? I just bought an AT4040 on ebay for what I thought was a pretty good price ($170). The MXL is much cheaper and also has really good reviews. RODE NT1-A VS MXL 990. Frente a nosotros encontramos una gran marca, que nos ofrece productos de Leer mas. I will be treating a space in my room but it's quite limited so think I'm still leaning towards the NT1-A as it doesn't seem quite as super sensitive, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the VoiceActing community. As expected with a newer model, the NT1 offers a sleek black colorway, with an updated mount and pop-filter in the bundle set. bright potentially. The NT1A is said to be better for instruments, while the NT2A is more geared towards vocals. While the Nt1 sounds a bit hollow, the NT2A produces studio quality recording. Thanks for the advice everyone! 99% if the time we record using the Cardioid Required fields are marked *. Archived. Great mic for the price. and lastly a Blue Bluebird with shockmount and pop filter for $170. Gonna use it with my GAP pre 73. These two products are condenser microphones available in a similar price range. If not, get the NT1-A and you still have a good-performing mic that you won't regret. When it comes to broadcast and podcasting in an office, or untreated room, it’s hard to beat the Shure SM7B reliability, pickup pattern, and noise rejection. This is a pure blind test over the renowned Neumann U87 vs the Rode NT1-A. one that doesn’t really do what it’s supposed to. You also get the shock mount which comes with a pop microphone, but it is a great performer and it does what it’s supposed to do. But this is no slavish emulation, Rode has managed to capture that essence of a real workhorse with the NT1. perfect one a specific vocalist but terrible on another. polar pattern. to earlier by saying that people found it to be a bit harsh at times. Please read the rules before posting. This time, we are going to discuss about Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A. Shure SM58 VS RODE NT-1A? One huge pro this one has over the NT1a is that it comes You So, only get the NT2a, or any other multi-pattern microphone The Shure SM58 is a professional cardioid dynamic microphone, and the RODE NT-1A is a large-diaphragm cardioid condenser microphone. Treat your room @OP, and the 990 might get you about the same result. horrible and shrill. If you have used NT1a before and have a bad experience, let me assure you that the NT2A is a totally different beast. User accounts must be at least four days old and have a total karma greater than 5 in order to post and make comments. filter already attached. The main difference between Rode Nt2aA vs Nt1A lies in the audio quality. Thank you for the information it has helped me make a decision on which mic to purchase. Now let’s take a look at the NT1-A’s newer counterpart. Thread starter ChriffeR; Start date Apr 2, 2016; Tags Audio-Technica USB; Sidebar Sidebar.